Unpermitted Work Disclosure Requirements: A State-by-State Guide

Disclosure laws for unpermitted work vary wildly across state lines. Rules that apply in California don't exist in Texas. Here's what the major states require when you sell a home with unpermitted work.

Last verified: March 2026 · Sources: State real estate commissions, state statutes

Jump to a state

  1. The disclosure landscape
  2. California
  3. Texas
  4. Florida
  5. New York
  6. North Carolina
  7. Illinois, Ohio, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan
  8. Quick comparison table
  9. Frequently asked questions

The disclosure landscape: one country, fifty standards

There is no federal disclosure requirement for unpermitted work. Each state sets its own rules through a combination of statute, real estate commission guidance, and case law. The result is a patchwork that ranges from California's aggressive, form-driven disclosure regime to states like Alabama where seller disclosure obligations are minimal.

But every state shares one constant: material facts must be disclosed. Unpermitted structural work, unpermitted plumbing, unpermitted electrical — these are material facts in every jurisdiction. The question isn't whether you need to disclose. It's how, when, and on what form.

If you're selling a home in a different state than where you last bought, don't assume the rules are the same. What was standard in one state may leave you legally exposed in another.

California: the gold standard for disclosure

California's disclosure requirements are the most comprehensive in the nation. The Transfer Disclosure Statement (TDS), required under Civil Code §1102, asks sellers to disclose known "additions, structural modifications, or other alterations or repairs" and whether permits and final inspections were obtained.

The Seller Property Questionnaire (SPQ) goes further, asking about specific systems: electrical, plumbing, heating, roofing, and structural components. If the seller knows any of this work was done without permits, they must say so.

As of July 1, 2024, California raised the bar again with Assembly Bill 968 (now Civil Code §1102.6e). This law targets property flippers — anyone reselling a 1–4 unit residential property within 18 months of acquisition. These sellers must now disclose all room additions, structural modifications, alterations, and repairs performed by a contractor, provide the name and contact information for each contractor used, and furnish copies of any permits obtained. The law applies when the cost of labor or materials exceeds $500.

For California sellers, this means you need to answer every question on the disclosure form honestly and completely. If you did work without permits, you must disclose it. California courts have ruled repeatedly against sellers who omitted known defects from their TDS.

Flipping in California? AB 968 (effective 2024) requires anyone reselling within 18 months of purchase to disclose all renovations, contractor details, and permit copies for work over $500. This law specifically targets house flippers.

Texas: caveat emptor with guardrails

Texas is a seller-friendly disclosure state. The Seller's Disclosure Notice (Texas Property Code §5.008) requires sellers to disclose known defects and conditions, including whether "any additions, structural changes, or other alterations have been made without necessary permits." But Texas courts have historically favored caveat emptor — the buyer's duty to inspect.

The practical implication: Texas sellers must disclose unpermitted work they know about, but the burden of discovery falls more heavily on the buyer and their inspection team. If the seller genuinely doesn't know the basement was finished without a permit (because it was done by a previous owner), their disclosure obligation is limited to actual knowledge.

For Texas sellers, just because the form doesn't explicitly ask about permits doesn't mean you're off the hook. If you know about unpermitted work and don't disclose it, you can still be sued for fraud or misrepresentation under general Texas property law.

Florida: no form, higher stakes

Florida does not have a mandatory standardized seller disclosure form. Instead, disclosure obligations come from case law, primarily Johnson v. Davis (1985), which established that sellers must disclose material facts "not readily observable" that affect the property's value. Unpermitted work qualifies.

Without a standard state form, sellers should still document what they know about the property's condition. Many transactions use the Florida Realtors "AS IS" contract, which includes representations about property condition but doesn't specifically ask about permits. That doesn't eliminate your obligation to be honest about what you know.

Florida's approach means savvy buyers run their own permit checks rather than relying on seller representations. In a state with extensive renovation activity — pool enclosures, hurricane retrofits, room additions — the permit gap is substantial.

New York: the $500 workaround

New York requires a Property Condition Disclosure Statement (PCDS) under Real Property Law §462, but sellers can opt out by providing the buyer a $500 credit at closing. An estimated 80–90% of sellers in the New York metro area take the credit option, which means buyers receive no formal disclosure at all.

The PCDS, when actually completed, asks whether the seller knows of any material defects and whether additions or alterations were made. It does not specifically ask about permits, making it less comprehensive than California's or Oregon's forms.

For buyers in New York, this means you can't rely on the seller's disclosure — they may have opted out of providing one entirely. Running your own permit history check is essential, especially on older homes with visible renovations.

North Carolina: explicit broker guidance

North Carolina's Residential Property Disclosure Act (N.C.G.S. §47E) requires sellers to complete a disclosure statement covering known material facts. The state's Real Estate Commission has published explicit guidance on broker responsibilities regarding permits.

The Commission's 2021 bulletin states that when properties are listed for sale, brokers "should inquire about all of the renovations, additions and repairs their seller-clients have made," obtain copies of invoices, and "contact their local building inspection offices to inquire whether permits and/or occupational licenses were required." If a broker discovers the seller failed to obtain a required permit, "this is a material fact that the broker must disclose to all prospective buyers, even if the seller chooses not to."

North Carolina also has a useful cost threshold: N.C.G.S. §160D-1110(c) states that no permit is required for work costing $15,000 or less on a single-family residence, unless it involves load-bearing structures, plumbing design changes, HVAC or electrical changes, or new roofing. This gives agents a clear framework for evaluating which renovations needed permits.

California has AB 968. Texas has caveat emptor. Florida has no form. North Carolina has a $15K threshold. If you work across markets, keeping this straight on every deal is the job.

Check Permits →

Five more states: Illinois, Ohio, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan

Illinois requires a Residential Real Property Disclosure Report under 765 ILCS 77. The form asks whether the seller is aware of modifications made without required permits. Illinois is explicit: if you know about unpermitted work, you must disclose it in writing.

Ohio requires a Residential Property Disclosure Form (ORC §5302.30) that asks about known material defects and structural modifications. The form doesn't specifically mention permits, but unpermitted structural work constitutes a material defect that must be disclosed.

Georgia has a seller disclosure form but follows a strong caveat emptor tradition. The Georgia Association of Realtors' form asks about known defects and alterations. Georgia courts have generally held that buyers have an obligation to inspect, but sellers cannot actively conceal known defects.

Pennsylvania requires a Seller's Property Disclosure Statement under 68 Pa.C.S. §7304 that covers known material defects. The form asks about alterations and additions and whether work was done by licensed contractors. Note that the Pennsylvania statute imposes liability for misrepresentations on the disclosure form.

Michigan requires a Seller's Disclosure Statement under MCL 565.957 that asks about additions, structural changes, and known defects. The form specifically asks whether alterations were made with required permits and whether final inspections were obtained — one of the more explicit permit-related disclosure requirements outside of California.

Quick comparison table

StateMandatory FormPermit-Specific QuestionsFlipper-Specific RulesCaveat Emptor Strength
CaliforniaYes (TDS + SPQ)ExplicitAB 968 (18-mo rule)Weak (seller-heavy)
TexasYes (TAR 1406)IndirectNoStrong
FloridaNo standard formN/ANoModerate
New YorkYes (or $500 credit)NoNoModerate
North CarolinaYesVia RE CommissionNoModerate
IllinoisYesExplicitNoWeak
OhioYesIndirectNoModerate
GeorgiaYesIndirectNoStrong
PennsylvaniaYesExplicitNoModerate
MichiganYesExplicitNoModerate

Check permit requirements for your project

Get a location-specific permit research report for any project at any address. Exact fees, timelines, code citations, and next steps — in under 5 minutes.

Check Permits Now → From $9.99 · Money-back guarantee

Frequently Asked Questions

Which states require disclosure of unpermitted work?

Almost all states require disclosure of known material defects, which courts have consistently held includes unpermitted work. California, Oregon, Illinois, Michigan, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania have explicit permit-related questions on mandatory disclosure forms. Texas and Georgia ask about modifications more generally. Even in minimal-disclosure states, sellers cannot actively conceal known material facts.

What happens if a seller doesn't disclose unpermitted work?

Buyers can sue for damages including remediation costs, diminished value, and attorney fees. In some states, the buyer can rescind the sale. Anyone involved in the transaction who knew or should have known about the issue can face civil liability.

Who is liable for undisclosed unpermitted work?

Sellers are liable when they knew or should have known. If you renovated the kitchen yourself without a permit, you can't claim ignorance. Agents involved in the transaction can also face liability if they failed to investigate obvious signs of unpermitted work, like a square footage discrepancy between the listing and tax records.

Do disclosure requirements differ for flippers?

In California, yes. AB 968 (effective July 2024) requires enhanced disclosure for anyone reselling within 18 months of purchase, including contractor names, renovation details, and permit copies for work over $500. Other states don't have flipper-specific disclosure laws, but the general duty to disclose material facts applies equally — and flippers who renovate without permits face heightened scrutiny from buyers.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information about state disclosure requirements. Laws change frequently. This is not legal advice. Consult a real estate attorney licensed in your state for guidance on your specific obligations.